Skip to main content

The Crimean Peninsula Conflict - Why borders matter

Credit: The Economist

Crimea is a heavily disputed region between Ukraine and Russia, and has drawn many international concerns on human rights violation and infringements of sovereignty. Ukraine has also sought action through the International Court of Justice, on the claims that Russia has been discriminating against Crimean Tatars, a minority in Crimea.

The case study is a prime example of anarchy, and why it is important for international relations to have a watchdog. It also exemplifies the arbitrary concept of borders and sovereignty, as well as why they continue to play an important role in politics.

The History 

The history of the Peninsula plays an important role in understanding the border dispute. Russia and Ukraine have historically faced a volatile relationship, and this escalated when Former President Viktor Yanukovych agreed to a deal with the EU, which caused a rift in relations with Russia. This led to a strong divide between Ukrainians, where each half wanted to integrate more with either the EU or Russia.

In March of 2014, the aforementioned instability allowed Russian troops to infiltrate the Crimean region, as part of integrating it with Russia on the claims that Crimea "had shown strong support for being a part of Russia". Strong international condemnation against Russia prompted a referendum to be held, where 96% of Crimeans wanted Crimea to be a part of Russia. This referendum was later declared illegitimate, because Russian troops had threatened Crimeans and exuded on a strong military presence to scare voters.

Human Rights Watch, an advocacy NGO, has reported multiple instances that Russian occupation in the Peninsula has led to persecution of Pro-Ukrainian activists and Crimean Tatars, for siding with the opposition. Crimean Tatars are a Muslim minority in Crimea, who have been able to gain some sort of autonomy over Crimea. However, Russian annexation of the region has threatened this power.

The Opinions

Supporters - Support of the Russian annexation have mainly been from Pro-Russian separatist movements in Ukraine. Therefore, they have used the argument of 'self determination' (which is a UN human right). They also claim that US support and intervention (by providing support to Viktor Yanukovych) was illegal and violated many of the existing treaties between Ukraine and Russia. 

Critics - Critics of the Russian annexation have been Crimean Tatars and Pro-Ukrainian activists - not only because of the lack of recognition but due to the discrimination and persecution they have faced.  This has violated the Budapest Memorandum, as well as the Convention on Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). 

EU - The EU has been a prominent actor in this conflict, because Russia's annexation has had a large destabilizing effect on Europe. The EU and Ukraine's close relations have led to the EU imposing harsh sanctions on Russia. 

The Answer

Credit: The Telegraph
Many regard borders as the fundamentals of politics - they govern the power and land a state has. We like to think of borders that remain omniscient, and outside of the influence of actors and people. However, this case study has made it exceedingly clear that borders are just as tangible as we imagine them to be the opposite, and that they are subject to change - especially with superpowers such as Russia.

This is why accountability is important - and why the ICJ and the UN are fundamental for a sense of 'justice' in the international community. Their function is not purely collaborative, and they act as excellent watchdogs to monitor human right violation cases and the respect of borders.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Kamala Harris a prosecutor for the people?

Presidential Candidate Joe Biden revealed on Tuesday afternoon that he had chosen California Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate for Vice President. This announcement sparked an outpouring of responses - many hailed Harris as a favorable choice given her experience as a U.S. senator, having already been put through the media wringer as a former presidential candidate, and being the first woman of color ever to be a part of a major party’s presidential ticket. Harris, the daughter of Jamaican and Indian immigrants, is Black and Asian-American.  But contrary to the Democratic establishment’s promotion of Harris's vice presidential candidacy, a substantial cohort of progressives and liberals greeted the news with critiques of her career, both as a prosecutor and lawmaking Senator. From denying affirming healthcare to a trans inmate to barring forums sex workers used to protect themselves, the former “ top cop ” has a concerning record of endangering the American community’s most...

Cancel Culture : Necessary or Out of Hand?

From singers to athletes to politicians to YouTubers and celebrities, many individuals have been “cancelled” in today’s world. Celebrities and social media influencers face the “cancel culture” the most as a result of their controversial actions, opinions and statements, predominantly from their past. The concept of “cancelling” someone refers to their online shaming and public boycotting by the masses, usually on social media which results in them facing major backlash from millennials and Gen Z. Today, many believe that the biggest endorser of this cancel culture is President Donald Trump himself against anyone who speaks against him or his actions.  History The movement to boycott an individual and essentially shame them online, rose to prominence in 2017 when the younger generations began calling out celebrities and influencers on their offensive language and action from the past. This has resulted in the mass shaming of numerous individuals over the years.  YouTubers, act...

Why is Hollywood immune to the #MeToo movement?

Fueled by the persistent gender inequalities and attitudes about gender and sexuality, our social environment has evolved to represent something that knowingly allows sexual violence to be normalized and justified. With the rise of the #MeToo movement, the eyes of feminists have been on Hollywood. Feminists around the world describe a “ matrix of sexism ” in which elements of rape culture in cinema have formed a taken-for-granted backdrop to their everyday lives. We readily discuss examples we witness through cinema and TV, including victim-blaming, “slut-shaming,” rape jokes, the celebration of male sexual conquest, and demeaning sexualized representations of women.  Rape culture and sexual assault have ingrained into the lives of anybody with a Netflix subscription or ticket from their local movie theater. With recent social media upsurge over a Polish Film, 365 days , many viewers around the world criticized Netflix for providing a platform for ‘cinema’ that romanticizes kidnap...