Skip to main content

The Crimean Peninsula Conflict - Why borders matter

Credit: The Economist

Crimea is a heavily disputed region between Ukraine and Russia, and has drawn many international concerns on human rights violation and infringements of sovereignty. Ukraine has also sought action through the International Court of Justice, on the claims that Russia has been discriminating against Crimean Tatars, a minority in Crimea.

The case study is a prime example of anarchy, and why it is important for international relations to have a watchdog. It also exemplifies the arbitrary concept of borders and sovereignty, as well as why they continue to play an important role in politics.

The History 

The history of the Peninsula plays an important role in understanding the border dispute. Russia and Ukraine have historically faced a volatile relationship, and this escalated when Former President Viktor Yanukovych agreed to a deal with the EU, which caused a rift in relations with Russia. This led to a strong divide between Ukrainians, where each half wanted to integrate more with either the EU or Russia.

In March of 2014, the aforementioned instability allowed Russian troops to infiltrate the Crimean region, as part of integrating it with Russia on the claims that Crimea "had shown strong support for being a part of Russia". Strong international condemnation against Russia prompted a referendum to be held, where 96% of Crimeans wanted Crimea to be a part of Russia. This referendum was later declared illegitimate, because Russian troops had threatened Crimeans and exuded on a strong military presence to scare voters.

Human Rights Watch, an advocacy NGO, has reported multiple instances that Russian occupation in the Peninsula has led to persecution of Pro-Ukrainian activists and Crimean Tatars, for siding with the opposition. Crimean Tatars are a Muslim minority in Crimea, who have been able to gain some sort of autonomy over Crimea. However, Russian annexation of the region has threatened this power.

The Opinions

Supporters - Support of the Russian annexation have mainly been from Pro-Russian separatist movements in Ukraine. Therefore, they have used the argument of 'self determination' (which is a UN human right). They also claim that US support and intervention (by providing support to Viktor Yanukovych) was illegal and violated many of the existing treaties between Ukraine and Russia. 

Critics - Critics of the Russian annexation have been Crimean Tatars and Pro-Ukrainian activists - not only because of the lack of recognition but due to the discrimination and persecution they have faced.  This has violated the Budapest Memorandum, as well as the Convention on Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). 

EU - The EU has been a prominent actor in this conflict, because Russia's annexation has had a large destabilizing effect on Europe. The EU and Ukraine's close relations have led to the EU imposing harsh sanctions on Russia. 

The Answer

Credit: The Telegraph
Many regard borders as the fundamentals of politics - they govern the power and land a state has. We like to think of borders that remain omniscient, and outside of the influence of actors and people. However, this case study has made it exceedingly clear that borders are just as tangible as we imagine them to be the opposite, and that they are subject to change - especially with superpowers such as Russia.

This is why accountability is important - and why the ICJ and the UN are fundamental for a sense of 'justice' in the international community. Their function is not purely collaborative, and they act as excellent watchdogs to monitor human right violation cases and the respect of borders.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Kamala Harris a prosecutor for the people?

Presidential Candidate Joe Biden revealed on Tuesday afternoon that he had chosen California Senator Kamala Harris as his running mate for Vice President. This announcement sparked an outpouring of responses - many hailed Harris as a favorable choice given her experience as a U.S. senator, having already been put through the media wringer as a former presidential candidate, and being the first woman of color ever to be a part of a major party’s presidential ticket. Harris, the daughter of Jamaican and Indian immigrants, is Black and Asian-American.  But contrary to the Democratic establishment’s promotion of Harris's vice presidential candidacy, a substantial cohort of progressives and liberals greeted the news with critiques of her career, both as a prosecutor and lawmaking Senator. From denying affirming healthcare to a trans inmate to barring forums sex workers used to protect themselves, the former “ top cop ” has a concerning record of endangering the American community’s most...

Why is Hollywood immune to the #MeToo movement?

Fueled by the persistent gender inequalities and attitudes about gender and sexuality, our social environment has evolved to represent something that knowingly allows sexual violence to be normalized and justified. With the rise of the #MeToo movement, the eyes of feminists have been on Hollywood. Feminists around the world describe a “ matrix of sexism ” in which elements of rape culture in cinema have formed a taken-for-granted backdrop to their everyday lives. We readily discuss examples we witness through cinema and TV, including victim-blaming, “slut-shaming,” rape jokes, the celebration of male sexual conquest, and demeaning sexualized representations of women.  Rape culture and sexual assault have ingrained into the lives of anybody with a Netflix subscription or ticket from their local movie theater. With recent social media upsurge over a Polish Film, 365 days , many viewers around the world criticized Netflix for providing a platform for ‘cinema’ that romanticizes kidnap...

Why Does India Dismiss Police Brutality?

Credit: Huffington post While the United States examines the role of race in their society, and how it impacts their brutal policing system, the world often ignores the underlying factors behind excessive police force and corruption in their own states. Gratuitous police brutality, custodial deaths and the evident indifference of politicians to blatant state enforced violence is not an uncommon occurrence in India. In recent times, heightened during the COVID-19 lockdown, countless instances of police violence against citizens have been filmed and circulated. They invoke outrage on social media — but this outrage is often limited. Police torture has become quite routine and there is a level of acceptance. In the US we see structural inequalities and systemic racism affect black Americans disproportionately. The same structural inequalities affect Indians based on their caste, religion and gender. Yet the reactions are vastly different; vicious police brutality is not enough to get ci...